Rina Saigo vs Riko Kikawada Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Apr at 04:54 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Saigo vs R. Kikawada

JPN
2
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Saigo 2 - 0 Kikawada
They have played 4 sets in total, with Rina Saigo winning 4 and Riko Kikawada winning 0. The last match between Rina Saigo and Riko Kikawada was at the W15 Kashiwa, 01-04-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Rina Saigo getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Saigo | 2 |
| Kikawada | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Kashiwa(04-01-25)
(Q1) W100 Tokyo(04-22-24)
R. Saigo vs R. Kikawada H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $19,500 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.63% (222-170) | Career Total W/L | 44.23% (46-58) |
| 2 | Hard | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
R. Saigo vs R. Kikawada Match Preview:
Analyzing their recent second serve performance, Saigo exhibits a notable advantage with 41.23% of points won, compared to Kikawada’s 36.07%. Such statistics often correlate strongly with predicting match outcomes, suggesting heightened competitiveness from Saigo when in service.
The return game is another critical area, where Saigo holds an edge in recent form by winning 54.49% of their opponent's second serve points, and a remarkable 38.46% for first serve returns. Kikawada trails in comparison, reflecting a less assertive 48.65% on second serve returns and 24.74% on first serve returns. These numbers significantly shape the head-to-head matchup dynamics, often identifying a match favorite.
Regarding handling pressure, both players exhibit nearly similar proficiency; Kikawada has saved 44.83% of breakpoints compared to Saigo’s 46.43%. Players’ ability to save breakpoints can considerably influence in-game momentum and betting predictions.
Assessing their overall performance over the past year, Kikawada secures a 40% win rate with a 12/18 record, while Saigo boasts a more impressive 60.32% win rate, achieving a 38/25 record. These figures provide a comprehensive outlook in predicting the head-to-head winner.
Surfaces play a decisive role in tennis, and Kikawada’s strongest on Hard courts, holding a 48% win rate, whereas their least favored surface is Indoor Hard with a 0% win rate. Conversely, Saigo excels on Clay with a 58% success rate, but displays vulnerability on Grass at 40%. Surface preferences can influence match execution and preparation drastically.
Reflecting on their playing levels over the previous year, Kikawada has participated predominantly in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events with a 47.62% success rate. Saigo, however, has engaged mainly in the more competitive Challengers/ITF events > $10K, with a 56.86% win rate, illuminating different competitive exposures and skill calibrations.
A direct head-to-head comparison sees Saigo ahead, having won the only encounter between them. The match, unfolding at the W 100 Tokyo on April 22, 2024, culminated with Saigo winning in straight sets, 6–2, 6–3, marking them the historical favorite.
Evaluating their match duration and resilience to match fatigue, historical games have averaged 1 hour and 55 minutes. Neither player has participated in a deciding set against each other or engaged in tiebreakers, indicating a decisive rather than prolonged gameplay dynamic.
Looking at their matches against quality opponents, Kikawada has faced players averaging a rank of 340.2, while Saigo has contended with slightly lesser-ranked opponents averaging 434.6. This factor may affect their adaptability and preparedness.
If the match extends to a deciding set, Saigo holds a significant advantage, winning 65% of such scenarios in the past year compared to Kikawada’s 50%. This capability may determine their psychological and tactical endurance during a prolonged contest.
Finally, break point conversion rates further differentiate the contenders. Kikawada, in recent form, excels with an 80% break point conversion rate, a critical element for seizing momentum, whereas Saigo's conversion stands at 44.35%, suggesting an area for potential improvement.
Considering all factors, Saigo’s past performance metrics, current form, and superior statistics in crucial areas project them as the anticipated winner in this matchup based on statistical analysis.
Rina Saigo vs Riko Kikawada Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Saigo vs R. Kikawada H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 7 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:34:48 | Average Match Time | 1:34:48 |
| 75% (67/89) | 1st Serve % | 64% (78/122) |
| 61% (41/67) | 1st Serve Win % | 44% (34/78) |
| 59% (13/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (15/44) |
| 72% (13/18) | Break Pts Won % | 57% (4/7) |
| 60% (73/122) | Return Points Win % | 39% (35/89) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Saigo Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R. Kikawada Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
QF | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 7-6(5) | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 0-6 6-3 | ||

R. Saigo vs R. Kikawada Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.63% (222/170) | YTD Win/Loss | 44.23% (46/58) |
| 55.34% (487/393) | Sets Win/Loss | 45.11% (106/129) |
| 52.45% (4142/3755) | Games Win/Loss | 47.22% (1044/1167) |
| 57.09% (145/109) | Hard Win/Loss | 46.43% (39/45) |
| 57.89% (55/40) | Clay Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 52.63% (20/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 37.50% (6/10) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 158 | Aces Total | 26 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 667 | Total Double Faults | 125 |
| 1:35:16 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 483.57 | Average Opponent Rank | 313.09 |
| 71% (15285/21503) | 1st Serve % | 67% (2195/3253) |
| 56% (8552/15285) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (1174/2195) |
| 46% (2856/6218) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (435/1058) |
| 49% (1475/2982) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (159/335) |
| 48% (10364/21687) | Return Points Win % | 43% (1329/3057) |
| 60.00% (6/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.65% (129/116) | Challenger W/L | 25.00% (7/21) |
| 63.50% (87/50) | Futures W/L | 51.32% (39/37) |
| 56% (218/387) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 44% (45/102) |
| 62% (41/66) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (6/14) |
| 53% (54/102) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (15/29) |
| 88% (205/181) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (47/42) |
| 11% (205/23) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (47/5) |
| 21% (186/39) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (57/5) |